There is a belief among conspiracy theorists and truthers that the powers behind the scenes tell us what they are up to before they do it. The reasons for this aren't as clear as the consensus that it happens. But I don't see how precedence should mean consequence. Just because something is talked about and then it happens... doesn't mean that's the reason.
Some reasons the elite might tell us what they are up to before they do it:
Number One:
The evil horrible nephilim/reptilian/royal/Zionist/Jesuit/NWO/vast wing conspiracist/controllers/powers that shouldn't be/bankers/Illuminati bloodlines/Masons/Space Aliens/Papists/Jews/White people/Evil Europeans/Axes of Evil are actually vampires and they have to invite us to participate in our own demise. They can't just do stuff that's evil but ask us or tempt us to do it. Like Dracula can't come in your house if you don't open the door or window for him to get in.
Evidence for this:
The Queen is descended from Vlad the Impaler- or is it on Charles' Daddy's side? I don't remember.
Pacts with evil just work like that. Evil is allowed to go so far but victims can't be completely innocent in this worldview because babies and ignorance is an excuse against culpability. If you don't reach out for the apple you're not going to be punished.
They like to laugh at the sheeple by getting us to participate in our own destruction. There's a better kick when the victims should have seen it coming but are still amazed or bewildered and just can't believe what just happened even though they were warned or maybe even better- they still have no idea.
Number Two:
All action starts with an idea. We didn't have communication devices in Star Trek because someday everyone would have a cell phone. We all have cell phones because we grew up watching inter-planetary communication devices. No one can invent anything until they think of it. Somebody writes fiction and then somebody else reads it and makes something similar happen.
Okay. But what about walkie-talkies and Dixie cups on a string? Those were real and they were first. But- did the telephone come before the string version? it's impossible to say whether life imitates art or the other way because yes; they do imitate each other.
Today I'm watching a New Year's Eve episode of The Tonight Show. There are four guests and I understand the first two listed were probably big hot stuff at the time. And then I think maybe the next two were up and comers- or one up and comer and one featured act for kicks; not career promotion. It's hard to know when the stardust settles.
There are four guests and two hosts. There's one black woman guest and the hosts and headliner are white men. The two white men hosts are mirrored by two anonymous black female singers for the woman singer. The commercials highlight race- black men as victims; both cheerfully sick in the present day and accused of rape of a white woman in a period piece.
One of the commercials is for a show in which an actor tries to do something serious with his life and soon there will be President Reagan- you know, the most conservative President yet the only one to have been divorced?
So who knew Reagan was coming? Does the villain in the show look like Mondale or is that my imagination.
Does Lola bring the church vibe to The Tonight Show so she can be accepted by that audience or does she use her platform to bring in some good news? Does she gospel it up to lead people to church or does she water it down to disparage it? is she advancing society or miring her people in the legacy of song and dance? Is Broadway bringing her up or is she held back to only that height? Does an individual represent a group or can it be a token or can it be just her?
Yesterday I was in a restaurant listening to Whitney Houston's I Wanna Dance With Somebody and we googled it. I wasn't sure about the spelling, and the young girl googling it was surprised at Whitney's race- it was a familiar song to her and Whitney Houston was a familiar name to her but I guess she never saw any of her movies or videos.
So as of yesterday, this person who I remember as a young singer who got married to a very black man so that she would still be accepted after white style songs; whose Mom sang backup for Elvis- and then for Aretha wearing that dress sagging to her knees- then became a symbol for drug death and then realizing it's a song used for the Pulse police to celebrate their new status as biggest murder of them all- yeah they dance around on tables now and maybe there was something to the rumors before Whitney married and why did Bobby have sex with a ghost and what was its gender- is now just a voice on the oldies station but somewhere in there there was a person.
I remember when I Wanna Dance With Somebody came out. I clearly remember having the same kind of reaction as I did recently to I'm In Love With Your Body. It just seems deliberately impersonal. She didn't sing that she was looking for a man or "the one" or me or him or somebody in particular; but the opposite- somebody. She's looking for somebody. Later in the song it is a "he" but there's a deliberate "anybody will do" "Love the one you're with" thought. And when the friends at Parliament House were featured for a split second in the Orlando Pulse follow-up video that's how I knew it was fake. If a bunch of fat queens with Divine make-up had clamored yeasty and breathless- and breastless into Dunkin' Donuts, the stock would have gone down and no one would have started wearing rainbow t-shirts. Has anybody noticed that it's not really a rainbow, even? People just don't look.
But look at those victims, supposedly attending Latin night. They all have USA t-shirts because the film was either released too early for Memorial Day or too late for July 4th. Knowing Orlando it was probably late but early makes more sense.
So did Lola Falana have a spot on The Tonight Show so that Diana Ross could get to the place where she would tour with Pavarotti and so that Whitney Houston could be thought of as white sounding due to Mariah Carey's status of race in between? How can we have the first African-American lady Oscar winner, a white Mariah Carey and the first African-American President when all three's mommas look like sisters? It's a thing- blackness. But what is it? Do we have to have the progression from Dandridge to Beyonce to get to where we are or would we have been here without them?
When Whitney died I was told that she had been the first popular woman singer to be black rather than a black singer. To me it's obvious that the speaker forgot about Diana Ross. But has the same thing happened with black men? Was Sammy Davis an entertainer who was black or a black entertainer. Did we have to wait for Wayne Brady to claim the honor- it seems he tries to look black now too. Is that because black can't be the very best, still?
Don't you love that still? As if we're marching forward and everything will be equal one day.
I do think the inequality of the races is done for- it's only had a five hundred year run. But somebody will be put out by somebody and there will be some other factor dividing us.
Maybe it will be hot sauce.
I'm so surprised at Popeyes that all the black people order mild chicken. Don't they know spicy is the best?
No comments:
Post a Comment